Shameful Behavior By Scott Reynolds
March 5th, 2010
Joe doesn’t sit idle when others attack his credibility and ethics.
That is unacceptable.
JoeBucsFan.com follows high journalistic standards and the writers here are sitting on nearly 40 years of professional journalism experience combined.
Joe can count maybe seven times — in over 4,300 posts — using unnamed sources, and Joe has always credited other publications and media members thoroughly and completely. And Joe’s reporting (not opinion) is scrutinized to the extreme to ensure accuracy and avoid recklessness.
So Joe was furious today when PewterReport.com publisher Scott Reynolds, the exalted leader at the Web-only publication, went on the record with a horrific slam of JoeBucsFan.com’s accuracy.
Reynolds’ baseless and classless comments were posted on the message boards of PewterReport.com. He took a shameful shot at Joe’s credibility in response to an anonymous commenter there named SoulBro.
The commenter referenced a JoeBucsFan.com story about Mark Dominik’s quote regarding the Bucs’ inactivity in free agency to Steve Duemig, of WDAE-AM, which Duemig reported on the air today — and was transcribed and reported about 3:30 p.m. on JoeBucsFan.com.
Reynolds responded with the following: (The “JBF” reference is to JoeBucsFan.com.)
“We’re already on top of it. We didn’t hear the radio interview, Soul Bro, and there is no podcast of it or a transcript. However, Jim Flynn has already reached out to MD for an exact quote (certainly cannot believe everything you read on JBF as they have been known take things out of context) so we can do a PR Alert story on it. Just waiting to hear back from him.”
March 5th, 2010 at 9:30 pm
“Mr. Reynolds, it’s time to show your manhood.”
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAA!!!!!!
March 5th, 2010 at 9:34 pm
Joe, your a huge douche. You sound like some jaded high school kid who sucks at everything and wants to get back at all the kids that picked on you.
Lol, your a loser. hahaha
March 5th, 2010 at 9:44 pm
Nice……. posts are moderated. Robert thinks joe and his site are full of pussys that will not allow commenting without moderation.
March 5th, 2010 at 9:45 pm
It’s pretty sad when supposed “insiders” aren’t even paying attention when the GM does an interview….
March 5th, 2010 at 9:47 pm
Ohhhhhhh… Cat fight!
March 5th, 2010 at 9:49 pm
Joe I gotta take a stand and agree with PR.com on this single tiny statement, “you can’t believe everything your read on JBF”
I mean Rastaman wrote that Raheem is a good HC.
Now come on Joe how can anyone really believe THAT?
😉
March 5th, 2010 at 9:53 pm
Both of you need to understand high school is over! While I understand anger at having your professionalism questioned, both of you have now done that. We as the reading public have come to understand that no one can or should ever believe all of what they read from any source. Rightly or wrongly, the journalism community has done this to itself! Please both of you just stick to reporting, whether sourced or un-sourced, and let us decipher it. We pay money to get information not a pissing contest.
March 5th, 2010 at 9:58 pm
This seems like a subjective judgement to me–in other words, something that can’t be proved or disproved. Didn’t the Pewter Report also make some sort of plagiarism charge against you eight months to a year ago?
Seems to me they just don’t like competition. If it helps any, I read your site, not theirs.
March 5th, 2010 at 9:59 pm
Hey bear,
Stop being intellectual and rationale please. Some of us enjoy the playground antics of the “professional journalists”. It happens on MSNBC/CNN/FOX so why not on sports as well?
I’m just waiting to read how PR says “my scoop’s bigger than your scoop”
:p
March 5th, 2010 at 10:02 pm
I’m suprised Scott Reynolds had time to even make this comment about Joe’s credibility.
I mean isn’t he busy thinking up more fake stories to dupe his subscribers with ??
March 5th, 2010 at 10:04 pm
C’mon now Joe, a wise man wouldn’t believe everything he reads in the New York Times or Wall Street Journal, let alone a blog covering a small-market sports team. In fact, a wise man wouldn’t believe everything he reads ANYWHERE.
It’s called critical thinking. And it’s nothing to take offense about. You have a good site, lots of people read it, but I guarantee you no one thinks what you post is guaranteed 100% gospel truth all the time. I’m sure they think the same about PR.
Relax.
March 5th, 2010 at 10:11 pm
Can’t you see what the Glazers are causing by not doing anything and not getting players. We’re fighting amoungst ourselves. I can’t live like this. I…I…I can’t.
March 5th, 2010 at 10:20 pm
No worries Joe, it’s just a case of professional jealousy by Mr. Reynolds.
March 5th, 2010 at 10:21 pm
Cry me a river Joe. You started it with your own cheap shot at them. They are like the New York Times of Buccaneers news, and you are like the Enquirer. You use misleading headlines everyday to pull people in. Your high and mighty act is a joke and frankly makes me want to quit visiting your site. Just stay true to being Joe and drop this nonsense.
March 5th, 2010 at 10:22 pm
This is like the local drunk challenging the Mayor to a debate. Not gonna happen.
March 5th, 2010 at 10:25 pm
Uhhhh…when did this site become about Joe and his feelings? Can we get back to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers? This little bickering match between competing sites is certainly not why I come here.
March 5th, 2010 at 10:37 pm
Hey anyone out there want to trade places in Round 1 of the draft? I’ll throw in coach Zorn as well…..
March 5th, 2010 at 11:04 pm
Can’t we just stop the bickering. I mean if anyone has no credibility its The big dog. If profootballtalk website crashes he would lose half his show from reading the headlines.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:10 pm
I’ve written 30+ stories for JBF in the past, and more than once, I’ve had to prove to Joe the reliabity of the source information in my stories. I didn’t take that personally at all, even though I’ve covered the NFL for years. It speaks of the credibility of this site…and of Joe.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:25 pm
What I find sad in all this is that JBF feels it necessary to try to make it’s own reputation by attacking PR…then feigns shock when Reynolds brushes off this little blog for what it is…a rumor mongering blog site with annoying third person diatribes.
I mean, you didn’t even get the context of the “rumor” right, Joe.
Pewter Report didn’t start the rumor, it posted the report of the rumors from other sites like National Football Post (with links even) with its own commentary as to whether it believed it to be factual.
Of course, in your zealous attempt to attack a reputable Buccaneer information outlet you failed to check your facts.
Seems to be par for the course around these parts.
And then you’re trolling around the Pewter Report messageboards for reaction to your nonsense?
Really? Are you that pathetic?
What’s sad is no one from Pewter Report would have even known you posted this if it weren’t for some of those same messageboard posters.
That’s about how insignificant this site is.
Who knows…maybe you’re SoulBro…
March 5th, 2010 at 11:28 pm
Mr. Lucky, you’re right…my bad. Let’s get ready to rumble:) The way the Bucs are going it might be the only entertainment for a while! Maybe it can be settled with a mud wrestling match between Joe’s favorite stalking victim (RW) and PR’s choice.
March 5th, 2010 at 11:28 pm
Ha ha… Come on Joe, you know you do like to take snippits of conversations, paint your own color commentary about why it appalled you, while the actual full conversation 9 times out of 10 was not as sensational as your description.
But, I enjoy your twist. It makes for great entertainment about the team I’m so passionate about.
I’m surprised Reynolds didn’t call you Troll Bucs Fan though… lol
March 5th, 2010 at 11:34 pm
Since when does ‘out of context’ mean ‘incaccurate’?
March 5th, 2010 at 11:35 pm
This is an interesting start to the off-season.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:09 am
Worlds Colliding!
March 6th, 2010 at 12:09 am
Gentlemen:
Joe’s not going to belabor this, but he will say this much:
Joe is not perfect, but he sure as hell strives to be. If Joe is wrong about anything, please point it out and Joe will take his medicine like a man.
In fact, Joe appreciates it when people do point out his errors because Joe wants to be accurate. But to make blanket, unfounded statements, no.
Joe still makes his living in the old media journalism field, including high profile clients such as a major metropolitan daily newspaper and MLB Advanced Media. For anyone – it matters not who – to suggest Joe is a plagiarist or that one can’t always believe what Joe writes in a pathetic attempt to cover one’s ass – Joe doesn’t take that seriously, Joe takes that personally.
And Joe will NOT cower or look the other way to such outrageous allegations!
Again, if Joe is wrong, please point it out and Joe will take it like man. Joe has no shame in admitting he is wrong.
One can call Joe all sorts of things, and probably would be correct. Calling Joe a plagiarist or accusing him of being loose with the truth, sorry pal!
The ball is in Scott Reynolds’ court.
What say you Scott?
For Joe’s loyal readers, he thanks you for your support very, very, very much. Joe is truly humbled. Thank you.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:16 am
Robert Smith:
Only one’s initial posts are moderated in an effort to prevent spam.
Joe was working Friday night on an assignment and was away from a computer for some six hours. Joe apologizes for not being quicker in approving your initial post.
Fire away man. So long as you don’t get totally out of hand, the floor is yours.
Joe can only remember editing or deleted four or five comments in two years because someone was using ugly ethnic sterotypes.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:20 am
I enjoy both sites. But Joe, can we focus on whats really important…just how much the Bucs ownership and their two tools really suck!
March 6th, 2010 at 12:49 am
JOE’S SITE IS VERY GOOD….PR IS JUST FEELING PRESSURE AND WORRIES IN THIS ECONOMY AS IT IS OBVIOUS TO INSIDERS THAT JOE’S SITE IS GAINING STEAM…WHILE PR MIGHT POSSIBLY BE STRUGGLING A BIT TO KEEP UP THIER PACE IN THIS ECONOMIC DOWNTURN….I HOPE BOTH SITES SURVIVE AND THRIVE AS I LIKE BOTH…..NOW AS FOR JOE AND SCOTT…..I WOULD LIKE TO BE THE REFEREE FOR A WWF STYLE STEEL CAGE MATCH BETWEEN YOU TWO….I WANT SCOTT REYNOLDS IN AN ANDRE THE GIANT PAIR OF TIGHTS WITH THE CLASSIC OVER THE SHOULDER ONE STRAP ATTACHMENT….WHILE JOE SHOULD COME IN LOOKING LIKE HACKSAW JIM DUGGAN WITH A LIL’ 2×4 LIKE JIM CARRIED……I WILL BE THE SHADY REF DRESSED LIKE THE SMELLY BUCS PIRATE WHO RUNS AROUND THE STADIUM DURING BUCS GAMES…..LETS DO THIS……ADAM FROM NY
PS LIL CHARLIE CAMPBELL IS NOT ALLOWED TO HANG AROUND RINGSIDE AS AN ACTING MANAGER FOR SCOTTY….PULLING CHEAP SHOTS, TRIPPING, AND TOSSING METAL FOLDING CHAIRS IN THE RING WHEN THE REF ISN’T LOOKING
March 6th, 2010 at 12:51 am
One os a website that requires payment to access good stuff, the other one is free. Obviously I would read JoeBucsfan.com every morning for the info on Bucs and obviously for Mr. Steve White’s articles and comments.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:52 am
once again you take “playful jabs” at pr.and please stop sayn your just defending your site. we all kno youve been waiting for something like this to happen.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:53 am
this is better than all the off season draft banter…..as we can all wait for the draft and let the pieces fall where thay may without all the pundits predictions and endless comentary……..adam from ny
ps LETS DO A TAG TEAM MATCH AND MAKE IT INTERESTING….
JOE AND STEVE WHITE vs. SCOTTY AND JERRY WUNSCH……NOW THAT COULD BE INTERESTING.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:56 am
and jus for the record, you do sometimes take stuff out of context.i bet if you offer the money youve recieved from your “draft” subscrition well all find something.”wat say you joe”?
March 6th, 2010 at 12:56 am
When someone speaks poorly about the competition, it reflects poorly on the speaker.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:58 am
IN FACT IT SHOULD BE A CLASSIC “LOSER LEAVE TOWN MATCH”….REMEMBER THOSE……IF JOE LOSES HIS SITE GOES CAPOOT……IF SCOTTY LOSES HE AND HIS BOY JIMBO FLYNN GOTTA SKIP TOWN AND LIL’ CHARLIE CAMBELL WILL THUS HAVE TO ATTEMPT TO RUN THE SHOW OVER THERE……..ADAM FROM NY
PS I BET IF JEFF FOX READ THIS THREAD HE WOULD BE SHAKING HIS PRISTINE HEAD AT ALL OF YOU AND THINKING “THIS WOULD NEVER BE HAPPENING IF I WAS STILL BMOC ON CAMPUS”
March 6th, 2010 at 1:00 am
WORD ON THE STREET IS HUGH MCARTHUR IS GONNA PUT A HIT OUT ON JOE……….JOE WATCH YA BACK MY BROTHER…..AND DONT BE SEEN HANGING IN FRONT OF ANY PORK STORES HOLDING A FRESH BOTTLE OF PEPPEROCINI!!………….ADAM FROM NY
March 6th, 2010 at 1:04 am
RIGHT NOW, SCOTT IS CALLING JIM….AND SAYING:
“JIM MAYBE WE SHOULD JUST OFFER JOE A JOB OVER HERE TO SQUASH THE BEEF”…….
JIM SAYS: “WE CANT REALLY AFFORD TO ADD ANOTHER MEMBER TO OUR LITTLE BUCCAROO CREW”….
SCOTT SAYS: “WE CAN CUT CHARLIE AND LET JOE COME IN….JUST LIKE WE CUT WOLF LAST YEAR”
March 6th, 2010 at 1:06 am
BOTTOM LINE IS THE GLAZERS WILL KNOW WHAT TO DO…LOL
WHAT WOULD THEY DO?………FIRE YOU ALL…..AND BRING IN CHEAP REPLACEMENTS
March 6th, 2010 at 1:26 am
Adam:
First, it appears you are enjoying your Friday night.
Second, Joe is content and happy in his current endeavors.
March 6th, 2010 at 1:33 am
It appears that Joe is pulling a fast one on all of us. There is no quote from Dominik. Dominik was not on Duemig’s show today. All information is sourced through Duemig. So Joe can call out whatever website it wishes while Joe’s “fan(s)” appear to have been duped again since he’s using a source known to put out information which is certainly either stretching or far from what most people consider the truth.
March 6th, 2010 at 2:02 am
Hey Joe,
Scott is surely guilty..
But your much worse. If I can prove 2 or more things BS, will you donate a 100 dollars in my name?
If not, your a hack.
March 6th, 2010 at 2:07 am
Hey Joe,
Why don’t you get yourself a wah burger and some french cries!
March 6th, 2010 at 2:15 am
Elijah:
First, Joe never made a blanket statement that one cannot trust an accurate news story on Pewter Report — with quotes even!
Second, Willie Parker and Doug Williams are two stories that spring to mind.
Third, hell yes Joe will be happy to drop a C-note on Warrick Dunn’s foundation.
In fact, if Scott would come forward and be a man, Joe would even entertain joining forces with him in a fundraiser of some sort with proceeds to go to Warrick Dunn’s foundation.
How exactly would that be a bad thing?
March 6th, 2010 at 2:31 am
Oh, and Elijah, if Joe is worse in inaccuracy on news stories as you suggest, feel free to dig through Joe’s free archives and prove it.
Otherwise… what was it you wrote about hacks?
March 6th, 2010 at 2:59 am
Joe took the ball and is running downfield on this one. …Listen, I’ll hand it to you Joe, Reynolds slapped you and you fired back with full artillery. Good for business. And I can’t believe I just spent 10 minutes on this. YOu got a great site. Keep it up.
March 6th, 2010 at 3:06 am
Gatorgod:
LOL Thanks for the compliments. Joe appreciates it.
March 6th, 2010 at 3:23 am
OK, Joe has had a few Caybrews and is irritated.
One of the first commenters in this thread goes by the moniker of “Robert Smith,” truly a bogus name if there ever was one.
This character trashed Joe because Joe was working tonight and couldn’t approve his initial posts right away.
The only “pussies” are the people that leave fake e-mail addresses.
Approving commenter’s first posts is an anti-spam device. This site does not recognize computers on the first comment. After the first comment is approved, the gates are open and free.
So this as*hole “Robert Smith” trashed Joe because Joe was away from his computer. The nerve of Joe to work for a living!
Joe tried to e-mail this as*hole “Robert Smith” to apologize for the delay, using the e-mail address he provided, Rsmith@datasoft.com. It is a bogus address.
But what is not bogus is this character’s IP address: 173.78.77.5. When pushed, Joe can be an equal dick as the neanderthals who copulate Scott Reynolds.
Don’t f’ with Joe!
March 6th, 2010 at 4:05 am
Touche’
March 6th, 2010 at 4:48 am
This has gotten way out of hand…
Maybe you HAVE had a few caybrews, Joe, because you’re responding to simple allegations and commentators (like myself) with fury and emotion. I love your blog and you typically have very sound theory in your posts, but it’s still a blog and other site’s have good reason to question you as you question them… sometimes with overly aggressive comments from yourself.
Let it go, Joe. Other sites have the same right you have to make hurtful comments about each other… it’s how you react to them that shows your class.
March 6th, 2010 at 5:16 am
Joe here,
08tefish – There are laws that protect Web publications, such as JoeBucsFan.com, against other publications issuing sweeping statements that attack one site’s credibility, especially when its malicious and from a competitor.
Joe doesn’t let that kind of stuff go. There’s no reason to.
March 6th, 2010 at 7:37 am
Pewter Report and Scott Reynolds especially is among the most arrogant people you will ever see in sports media. I subscribed a few years ago just before they started their “no agendas” campaign, which was all about continually slamming all other media in town and promoting themselves as the only honest, non-biased Buccaneers media outlet. At that point I had grown sick of the Gruden bashing in the Tribune and St. Pete Times so I agreed with their message. But with time it has just gotten out of hand.
I don’t know if they still use the full page no-agenda ads in their magazine but when I finally unsubscribed for good a little over a year ago it was mainly because I could literally not read a Fab 5 (Scott’s weekly column) without there being something about another media outlet, from Tampa or nationally, who had gotten a story completely wrong, or something along the lines of “as we at Pewter Report told you before anyone else last week…”. I don’t need anybody telling me how good their reporting is, and especially not how bad everybody else is. Unfortunately lots of faithful Pewter Report fans seem to be buying it and would never believe anything the other papers say until it is reported by PR. All media have good and bad writers and even bad writers have good stories once in a while. I prefer reading a little bit of everything myself and forming my own opinion instead of having someone, who charges money for their content no less, telling me who to listen to.
March 6th, 2010 at 8:51 am
still goin at it huh?.its pathetic that joe thinks he can take “playful jabs” at other ppl/sites, but nobody can say anything to joe.& now your even calling out ppl who leave comments.how low can u go
March 6th, 2010 at 9:43 am
Scott is a fn tool. If I ever meet him Id give him a wedgee. PR thinks they are the premire Buc sight yet I have yet to see them break a “true” story. They all suck and Hugh likes cheating on wife
March 6th, 2010 at 10:11 am
Hey Joe, buddy, I’m with you all the way.
I’ve been here with you since shortly after you started, and nothing can deter me. I have my own business too, and when you’re good, people with little class or belief in their own abilities will take pot shots at you from time to time. It’s akin to a political campaign. When they are losing and become desperate, they resort to tearing down, distorting, and yes even liable against their opponent. The fact of the matter is that there is plenty enough Booty to go around for everybody. I have been to PR maybe 10 times over the past year, but I come to JoeyButtaFuko.com every day, sometimes more. Just remember Joe, that when you call your Lawyer, it has to be a last resort. At that point only The Lawyers Win and everyone else loses, and one lucky schmuck may get to break even. You said your peace, most of us take PR’s comment for what it’s worth, a grain of salt, and move on.
For the record that email from Robby should read Rsmith@dickstoosoft.com
March 6th, 2010 at 10:33 am
Joe…with every response you look more and more unprofessional. You stepped out of line when you made this blog about you instead of the Bucs. Nobody really cares. Please move on from this and pretend it never happened. Get back to the Bucs.
March 6th, 2010 at 11:07 am
JDouble, I have to disagree with you there.
One of the things that makes Joe’s site great is the personal passion he brings to it every freaking day. It’s his Baby and he loves it. I understand his defending of his work. If more people wore their hearts on their sleeves, there would be a whole lot less Bull Sh*t in the world today. When someone calls you out, punch them in the face. Never give them the first punch. That’s for losers, pacifists and progressive Democrats. Semper Fi & Bombs Away!
March 6th, 2010 at 11:10 am
I do think Scott’s comment was over generalized and out of line. The line – (certainly cannot believe everything you read on JBF as they have been known take things out of context) is incendiary and calls for a measured response as Joe has done. I believe that Scott does owe JBF a public apology for that statement and I would be very surprised if Hugh Macarthur didn’t see to it. Personally, I don’t care for the sniping, I enjoy both websites.
March 6th, 2010 at 11:38 am
JD – I’m with BigMac on this issue.
JBF is Joe’s baby and Joe does a great job with it.
Now some will say that Joe only gather’s “other people’s stories” and publishes othere people’s work.
I say Bullsh*t. Joe adds so much more to those stories and that’s what makes JBF original, fun and interesting.
PLUS Joe has Steve White and sometimes Jeff Carlson in addition to original pieces that Joe has done on Sammy Stroughter as well (Joe does much more than that as well)
Plus Joe comes on here and does live chats as well – speaking of which when is the NEXT ONE??????
The only problem is Joe has thin skin but I believe over time it will thicken up.
Love ya Joe!!!!
March 6th, 2010 at 12:04 pm
JDouble wrote: “Joe…You stepped out of line when you made this blog about you instead of the Bucs. Nobody really cares. Please move on from this and pretend it never happened.”
JD if that were true why do you come to JBF and read? You can go to PR.com instead but you don’t. You read JBF because of the flavor that Joe inputs to the stories. You care, even if you don’t agree, about Joe’s opinion and his take.
When that aluminum plated Miss Reynolds accusses Joe of making up stories don”t you think Joe has a right to defend himself against alligations?
If you think/believe that Joe will make up shit about Dumminik’s take on FA how can you believe anything else?
On a separate point I think this topic is like a written version of Monday night RAW; so who wouldn’t love to see that whimp Scotty being piledrived?
March 6th, 2010 at 12:07 pm
This garbage site is worse now than when it started.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:10 pm
I like jbf and pr but I LOVE the Bucs. Can’t we all just get along???
March 6th, 2010 at 12:11 pm
Funny how people hate it here yet continue to return. The Glazers should home the fan base has the same attitude about buying tickets.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:25 pm
To be totally honest…. Joe is the ID (as in ID, Ego and SuperEgo) in all of us.
He loves beer, women, the Bucs, women and calls it like he sees it.
The reason most of us read this site is because Joe is absolutely addicted to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and all the stories and rumors and debates that come with.
Joe is even emotionally driven.
So before you guys take the politically correct stand against Joe, remember what Joe really stands for: The Bucs, women, beer and an addiction to pro football machine and how it applies to The Bucs.
With all that said, Joe this is your site, you can do and say what the HELL ever you want buddy. People keep coming back here because of your awesome perspective regarding the Bucs… The tailgate perspective, the sports bar perspective…. Every mans ID.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:52 pm
Joe here,
RahDomDaBest – You warmed Joe’s heart. Or is is that the Viagra wearing off? Regardless, you get it. And it’s appreciated.
March 6th, 2010 at 1:19 pm
WesTampa enjoys reading your site but WesTampa thinks the 3rd person is incredibly gay and annoying.
March 6th, 2010 at 2:22 pm
joe:
yes a couple brews and a computer can be a dangerous thing for adam as well (3rd person…hehe)…….anyway back to football and keep up the good work….its pretty obvious people like your site….3 cheers for joe!!
adam from ny
March 6th, 2010 at 2:47 pm
I would just like to say; I like JBF, I like PR, I do not like Duemig.
Maybe one day the Glazers will finally sell and that BS report that douche made years ago will be proven accurate. Or maybe, just maybe he’s a blowhard and a hack.
I would love for Duemig to open the same challenge that JBF does and offer 100 dollar donations to everyone that can find inaccurate reporting he’s made. Depending on how many people listened, Warrick Dunn’s foundation would start to rival the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation in size after not too long.
Sorry Tom, can’t let that last comment slide. — Joe
March 6th, 2010 at 3:29 pm
JDouble, you said yesterday you weren’t coming back until after the draft, yet you’re back on today–admit it, you’re smitten with Joe and his work, and can’t just walk away!! 🙂
March 6th, 2010 at 6:23 pm
The information that people pay for on Pewter Insider , Joe usually has posted on his site ,for free, before them anyhow. The rest is just speculation and opinion pieces backed by NO sources.
So why would I pay?? You suck Reynolds and FLynn
March 6th, 2010 at 7:56 pm
My question is what the f_ck is wrong with Dominick. That idiot won’t sign any FA’s. He is a Dumbass and should go to work for Pooter Repoire.
March 6th, 2010 at 8:44 pm
big mac:
dommy cant sign anyone unless the glazers approve it….so nothing is wrong with dommy & morry…..the big glass house they are all living in is the real problem……adam from ny
March 6th, 2010 at 9:33 pm
Yea Adam, sounds like the place is overdue for a good rock fight.
March 7th, 2010 at 1:38 am
This is a sports related website, right? If somebody hits me, I feel an obligation not only to myself but to any audience to strike back and at least make it a good fight. I may get my ass kicked, but I’ll be damned if I’m going down without a fight!!
Critique his style all you want, but Joe is not going down without landing a few punches.
March 7th, 2010 at 7:58 pm
620 vs 1010…I chose 1010
March 8th, 2010 at 7:48 pm
Nice work on this one Joe. You just lost a reader by acting like a petulant child.
Adios douchebag, and good luck (you’re gonna need it.)